Congratulations to CNSA’s #Tianwen1 team for the successful landing of China’s first Mars exploration rover, #Zhurong! Together with the global science community, I look forward to the important contributions this mission will make to humanity’s understanding of the Red Planet.
Enhorabuena al equipo CNSA #Tianwen1 por el aterrizaje exitoso del primer rover de exploración de Marte de China,#Zhurong ! Junto con la comunidad científica mundial, espero con interés las importantes contribuciones que esta misión hará para que la humanidad comprenda el planeta rojo.
________________________
Vía/autor (Jmartinezmoran @jmartinezmoran): 'Muchísimas gracias a todos por vuestros mensajes y felicitaciones Es el sueño de cualquier astrofotógrafo y un auténtico honor que la @NASA valore tu trabajo de esta manera.Gracias por elegir mi foto como #Apod (Astronomy picture of the day) ¡Gracias! ' twitter.com/jmartinezmoran/status/1109579503376977921
He added that further study was needed to determine the extent of carbon emmissions' impact on global warming.
That view contradicts the stance of the Environmental Protection Agency itself, as well as the conclusion of NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, co-chair of the Senate Climate Action Task Force issued a statement shortly after the interview calling Pruitt's views "extreme" and "irresponsible."
"Anyone who denies over a century's worth of established science and basic facts is unqualified to be the administrator of the EPA. Now more than ever, the Senate needs to stand up to Scott Pruitt and his dangerous views," he said in a statement.
Sen. Tom Carper, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, tweeted about the comment, "I think 97% of the world's scientists were surprised to learn this today! I know I was."
Carper was referring to a frequently cited study that found 97 percent of climate scientists who issued opinions on the cause of climate change ascribe the phenomenon to human activity. Those findings have been disputed.
California Sen. Kamala Harris also had a tweet for Pruitt: "It's telling when you're at odds with @NASA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and science generally."
Gina McCarthy, the last EPA administrator, also weighed in, saying, "The world of science is about empirical evidence, not beliefs. When it comes to climate change, the evidence is robust and overwhelmingly clear that the cost of inaction is unacceptably high."
Ben Santer, a climate researcher at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, said Pruitt's comment on CNBC was flat wrong.
#15 Nene, la noticia dice "Los jefes de la gran empresa cobran más en plena crisis" podías centrarte en comentar esto y no en divulgar trolas de medios de comunicación que no son de tu cuerda porque como tu dices "Mira majete, un día te tomas tu tiempo y nos presentas pruebas de lo que dices"
Y ahora nos defiendes razonadamente que es coherente que los de siempre se suban el sueldo y pidan despido libre y bajadas de sueldo.
#15 eso sera el que los paga porque hay mucho empresario que ha dejado de pagar las nominas, aunque claro tienen que seguir trabajando los asalariados gratis y sino vete y pierde todos tus derechos a cobrar lo que te has ganado
malo es que te tengan que despedir pero por lo menos que te paguen lo que te corresponde segun la ley