"Røeggen bought a product that was bad, and the supreme court judged that he should have his money back, since the product was not as advertised. (He was advised to take out a loan and put it into stock market indexes, due to interest and stock market performing badly, he lost a decent amount (almost half) of the initial loan) The product was advertised as Safe. The reason why the decision reached by the supreme court is so important is that it affects about 4000 other people who bought similar products and saw large amounts of their savings disappear."
@Strike_Freedom No parece un hoax. 5 litros en un mes me parece factible, aunque no sea eficiente. Es una tecnologia muy reciente, hay demasiado espacio para mejorarla. Mira en redd.it/11py6z
"Røeggen bought a product that was bad, and the supreme court judged that he should have his money back, since the product was not as advertised. (He was advised to take out a loan and put it into stock market indexes, due to interest and stock market performing badly, he lost a decent amount (almost half) of the initial loan) The product was advertised as Safe. The reason why the decision reached by the supreme court is so important is that it affects about 4000 other people who bought similar products and saw large amounts of their savings disappear."
Articulo 233: www.reddit.com/r/argentina/comments/19qeoe/murió_hugo_chávez/c8qdy5c
Ahora en serio, esta bien chevere.