#51Es decir, un año después de que ingleses y franceses consumaran la traición de Munich y regalaran Checoslovaquia y decidieran no hacer nada por Polonia.....seguían sin pactar nada con la URSS.
At the same time, British, French, and Soviet negotiators scheduled three-party talks on military matters to occur in Moscow in August 1939 that aimed to define what the agreement would specify on the reaction of the three powers to a German attack. The tripartite military talks, started in mid-August, hit a sticking point on the passage of Soviet troops through Poland if Germans attacked, and the parties waited as British and French officials overseas pressured Polish officials to agree to such terms. Polish officials refused to allow Soviet troops into Polish territory if Germany attacked; Polish Foreign Minister Józef Beck pointed out that the Polish government feared that if the Red Army entered Polish territory, it would never leave.
On 19 August, the 1939 German–Soviet Commercial Agreement was finally signed. On 21 August, the Soviets suspended the tripartite military talks and cited other reasons.
¿Acaso fueron los soviéticos, ya que los equiparas como fraternales aliados, los que liquidaron a 5'7 millones de polacos?
Si es que no te sale demasiado bien esto de hacer comparaciones por tu evidente sesgo anglonazi.
Soviet Invasion of Poland: The Soviet invasion of Poland was a military conflict by the Soviet Union without a formal declaration of war. On 17 September 1939, the Soviet Union invaded Poland from the east, 16 days after Nazi Germany invaded Poland from the west. Subsequent military operations lasted for the following 20 days and ended on 6 October 1939 with the two-way division and annexation of the entire territory of the Second Polish Republic by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. This division is sometimes called the Fourth Partition of Poland. The Soviet
3. As of 31 October 2022, OHCHR – through the United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) – had documented summary executions and attacks on individual civilians in 102 villages and towns of the three regions between 24 February and 6 April 2022. The acts in question were committed by Russian armed forces in control of these areas and led to the deaths of 441 civilians (341 men, 72 women, 20 boys and 8 girls). One hundred of those killings are analysed in this report and its Annex, as illustrative examples of the suffering borne by civilians in these areas.
4. Information available to OHCHR indicates that the total number of summary executions and lethal attacks directed against individual civilians by Russian armed forces in the three regions during the reporting period is likely considerably higher.
[...]
6. Fifty-seven of the 100 killings presented in the report and its Annex are assessed as summary executions (48 men, 7 women, and 2 boys). Thirty of those took place in places of detention and the other 27 victims were summarily executed on the spot, shortly after coming under the control of the perpetrators. OHCHR found that men and boys were overwhelmingly targeted, comprising 88 per cent of all victims of summary executions. In most cases, Russian soldiers detained civilians on suspicion of participating in hostilities or otherwise contributing to the war effort. The periods of detention prior to the executions varied from a few hours to several weeks. Civilians were detained in houses, basements, garages, industrial or office compounds, or other premises occupied by Russian troops. In most cases, victims of killings in places of detention were found with their hands cuffed or bound by duct-tape, and with injuries suggesting torture or other
#211 - Sobre la unidad histórica de Rusos y Ucranianos: Durante la reciente Línea Directa, cuando me preguntaron por las relaciones ruso-ucranianas, dije que rusos y ucranianos eran un solo pueblo, un todo único. Estas palabras no estaban motivadas por consideraciones a corto plazo ni por el contexto político actual. Es lo que he dicho en numerosas ocasiones y lo que creo firmemente. Por ello, considero necesario explicar detalladamente mi posición y compartir mis valoraciones sobre la situación actual.
- Qué debería hacer Rusia con Ucrania (RIA Novosti).
- Temor a que el lenguaje genocida en medios rusos provoque más crímenes de guerra
- - TV Estatal Rusa: Esto es lo que dice Vika Nuland. Afirma que Vladimir Putin está cometiendo un genocidio. Ella dice específicamente: El objetivo de Putin es evidente: borrar la idea de ser ucraniano. Estoy de acuerdo con Vika Nuland. Vika, eres un genio. Hay que borrar esa idea.
- Vladimir Soloviov: No salvaremos Odesa. Destruyamos también Kyiv y Kharkiv.
- Vladimir Soloviov, siendo consistente: Deberíamos dar a la gente 48h para abandonar Jarkov y demolerla manzana a manzana [...] explicadme, ¿por qué Kiev sigue existiendo? [...] La madre de todas las ciudades rusas tomada por enemigos, son nazis
- Vladimir Soloviov: Cuando se deparasita a un gato, para los gusanos es una guerra, pero para
3- Una condición para establecer una analogía es que las cosas comparadas sean análogas. En el mundo real, no en las fantasías que compartes, como tantas otras cosas, con el fascismo ruso.
#209 Sigues sin responder a mi pregunta. Te la repito una vez más.
Dado que respetas los juícios de Katchanovski en materias en las que no tiene ni idea, imagino que sí daras valor a sus juícios sobre materias en la que es un experto:
En Ucrania, los nacionalistas ganan influencia, y escrutinio (Reuters, 18-03-2014) "Pero Ivan Katchanovski, politólogo de la Universidad de Ottawa que ha estudiado la extrema derecha en Ucrania, discrepó de que Svoboda fuera tan extremista. "Actualmente, Svoboda se describe mejor como un partido nacionalista radical, y no como fascista o neonazi", afirmó. "En estos momentos no es abiertamente antisemita".
¿A que sí? Seguro que crees que Svoboda no es nazi, o, al menos, no lo era en 2014. ¿Verdad?
“The volume of credible allegations of torture and other inhumane acts that are being perpetrated against civilians and prisoners of war by Russian authorities appears to be unabating,” said Alice Jill Edwards, the UN Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. “These grievous acts appear neither random nor incidental, but rather orchestrated as part of a State policy to intimidate, instil fear, punish, or extract information and confessions,” Edwards said in a statement at the end of an official visit to Ukraine.
The UN torture expert gathered harrowing testimonies involving electric charges being applied to ears and genitals, beatings of all kinds, mock executions at gunpoint, simulated drowning, being required to hold stress positions, threats of rape or death, and various ceremonies of ridicule and humiliation. Returned Ukrainian civilians and soldiers recounted being crowded in basements and cells, in congested conditions, and being poorly fed. Several lost dangerous levels of weight.
Edwards said these acts would constitute torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, prohibited at all times and in all circumstances under international human rights and humanitarian law.
Igualito que los ucranianos:
During her seven-day visit to Ukraine, the Special Rapporteur also visited different places and facilities and inspected the conditions of treatment of Russian prisoners of war and those accused of conflict-related crimes.
“I found that sincere efforts have been made by the Ukrainian authorities to treat Russian prisoners of war respectfully. The barrack-style facilities I visited were hygienic and orderly. Prisoners were being well fed, were receiving medical attention for their battlefield injuries, were able to practice their religion and had paid work and recreational facilities,” Edwards said.
3. As of 31 October 2022, OHCHR – through the United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) – had documented summary executions and attacks on individual civilians in 102 villages and towns of the three regions between 24 February and 6 April 2022. The acts in question were committed by Russian armed forces in control of these areas and led to the deaths of 441 civilians (341 men, 72 women, 20 boys and 8 girls). One hundred of those killings are analysed in this report and its Annex, as illustrative examples of the suffering borne by civilians in these areas.
4. Information available to OHCHR indicates that the total number of summary executions and lethal attacks directed against individual civilians by Russian armed forces in the three regions during the reporting period is likely considerably higher.
[...]
6. Fifty-seven of the 100 killings presented in the report and its Annex are assessed as summary executions (48 men, 7 women, and 2 boys). Thirty of those took place in places of detention and the other 27 victims were summarily executed on the spot, shortly after coming under the control of the perpetrators. OHCHR found that men and boys were overwhelmingly targeted, comprising 88 per cent of all victims of summary executions. In most cases, Russian soldiers detained civilians on suspicion of participating in hostilities or otherwise contributing to the war effort. The periods of detention prior to the executions varied from a few hours to several weeks. Civilians were detained in houses, basements, garages, industrial or
#208 Y una vez más, en aras de la rediculez terminal, sigues siendo patéticamente incapaz de explicar cual es es el mecanismo causal por el cual Boris Johnson lleva dos años obligando a los ucranianos a luchar en contra de su voluntad. A pesar de que el tipo no tiene ningún cargo público.
Porque mentir sin cesar, a pesar de que los demás saben que estás mintiendo, no es ser duro de mollera.
#162 Que sí, que otra vez, que si lo dice Putin y lo repiten sus papagayos debe ser verdad
El caso es que la persona en cuestión a la que habrían ofrecido dichas garantías tenía una opinión diferente:
En 2010, el propio Gorbachov consideró el ingreso de países del Este en la Alianza una “violación del espíritu de las declaraciones y garantías” de Occidente, si bien admitió que esa cuestión «no se discutió en absoluto» en aquellos años.
"En una entrevista concedida a Russia Beyond, el expresidente soviético precisó que los acuerdos para la reunificación alemana solo garantizaban que “no se colocarían armas de destrucción masiva” ni “estructuras militares” en la parte oriental de Alemania."
#3 Tambien somos un puerto donde paran algunas de las armas que vienen del otro lado del mar, tenemos unas bases usanas, un puerto "bloqueable" donde reparan submarinos rotos ingleses y somos fabricantes de municion, no se como afectara en una escala global pero seguro que alguien en algun sitio ha hecho cuentas.
#1#2 Bueno y que España no es "cualquier país", porque España tiene un peso específico considerable en el Mundo y afecta a la realidad israelí.
Es una de las economías más fuertes del planeta (comentarios apocalípticos luego, please), el cuarto país más poblado de la UE, miembro de la OTAN, con una posición geoestratégica importante y con buenas relaciones con los países musulmanes.
Vamos, totalmente de acuerdo con #3 y #17 salvo en una cosa: el gobierno podrá ser muy pro-gringo pero la gente de a pie no. Palestina despierta simpatías probablemente entre mucha más gente que en cualquier otro país europeo. Y hay que mantener los negocios, por turbios que sean, con los países árabes.
#3 España tiene una posición única, siempre ha sido puente entre europa y África y entre el mediterráneo y el océano, tenemos lazos con países árabes, somos de los países europeos con más contacto con la resistencia palestina debido al pueblo saharaui, pero además también tenemos mucha influencia (y estamos influenciados) con LATAM, mientras que por ejemplo Alemania solo trata con gente pro Israel, España tiene mucho contacto con gente pro palestina, y el hecho de que la cuarta potencia europea abra este melón puede arrastrar a más gente, eso es lo que teme Israel.
El único problema es que ese liderazgo durará hasta las elecciones europeas, luego volveremos al redil pro usa, pero en fin, eso es otro tema
At the same time, British, French, and Soviet negotiators scheduled three-party talks on military matters to occur in Moscow in August 1939 that aimed to define what the agreement would specify on the reaction of the three powers to a German attack. The tripartite military talks, started in mid-August, hit a sticking point on the passage of Soviet troops through Poland if Germans attacked, and the parties waited as British and French officials overseas pressured Polish officials to agree to such terms. Polish officials refused to allow Soviet troops into Polish territory if Germany attacked; Polish Foreign Minister Józef Beck pointed out that the Polish government feared that if the Red Army entered Polish territory, it would never leave.
On 19 August, the 1939 German–Soviet Commercial Agreement was finally signed. On 21 August, the Soviets suspended the tripartite military talks and cited other reasons.
¿Acaso fueron los soviéticos, ya que los equiparas como fraternales aliados, los que liquidaron a 5'7 millones de polacos?
Si es que no te sale demasiado bien esto de hacer comparaciones por tu evidente sesgo anglonazi.
Soviet Invasion of Poland: The Soviet invasion of Poland was a military conflict by the Soviet Union without a formal declaration of war. On 17 September 1939, the Soviet Union invaded Poland from the east, 16 days after Nazi Germany invaded Poland from the west. Subsequent military operations lasted for the following 20 days and ended on 6 October 1939 with the two-way division and annexation of the entire territory of the Second Polish Republic by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. This division is sometimes called the Fourth Partition of Poland. The Soviet
…